Relearning to Rise: Part-Practice Versus Whole-Practice Sit-To-Stand Training in Post-Stroke Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Nancy Anne Josop Physiotherapy Department, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Pahang 50586 Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia Author
  • Norhayati Hussein Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Rehabilitasi Cheras, Jalan Yaakob Latiff 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Author
  • Mohd Azzuan Ahmad Physiotherapy Program, Centre for Rehabilitation and Special Needs Studies (iCaRehab), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50586 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Author
  • Nor Azlin Mohd Nordin Physiotherapy Program, Centre for Rehabilitation and Special Needs Studies (iCaRehab), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50586 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Author

Keywords:

Stroke rehabilitation, sit-to-stand training, part-practice, whole-practice, motor learning, randomised controlled trial.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide, often resulting in muscle weakness, impaired balance, and reduced ability to perform activities of daily living. Sit-to-stand (STS) training is a key intervention in stroke rehabilitation; however, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal training approach. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of part-practice and whole-practice STS training in improving functional performance and quality of life among post-stroke individuals. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 36 post-stroke individuals allocated to either a part-practice STS training group (n=18) or a whole-practice STS training group (n=18). Outcome measures included the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD), Five-Times Sit-to-Stand (5TSTS) test, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale. Two-way mixed-model ANOVA, Friedman’s test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used to evaluate intervention effects. Results: Significant main effects of time were observed across all outcome measures following STS training ( p<0.05). Although no significant time-by-group interaction was identified, the part-practice group demonstrated greater mean improvements in right quadriceps strength (+1.76±1.92), left quadriceps strength (+1.34±1.51), right gluteus strength (+1.20±1.10), 5TSTS performance (−3.40±1.92 seconds), and SS-QOL scores (+14.4±7.58) compared with the whole-practice group. Conclusion: STS training is an effective task-specific intervention in stroke rehabilitation. While both approaches improved outcomes, part-practice training demonstrated greater clinical improvements in selected measures and may offer additional benefits for individuals with motor planning difficulties. These findings support the integration of part-practice STS training into evidence-based stroke rehabilitation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-07